Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Critique - Essay ExampleHomosexual marriages cannot be bonnieified without drawing help from logical f wholeacies and making broad generalizations. Summary of the obligate In his article, Sullivan argues that gay marriage is eligible for legalization by all means. Marriage is a social contract. Marriage is a physical and emotional trammel between two people irrespective of their gender. People, who have been denied to fall in love with somebody despite the natural love they feel can better(p) understand how it feels when a gay is denied the right to get married. Illegalizing gay marriage is a torture for the homosexual people whereas legalization of gay marriage would will the homosexual people with grounds to have normal relationships with their p arnts and loved ones rather than being socially outcast. Gay parenting does not have any unfavorable impacts on the childrens psychology, Homosexual marriages have existed throughout the history in forms different from the traditional marriage. Dating, love, and relationship everything becomes meaningless for them when they cannot get married. Without marriage, there is no commitment. Homosexuality occurs naturally, and this challenges all conservative reasons against the legalization of gay marriage. Therefore, gay marriage should be legalized. ... ls by excessively making use of such emotional words as roughly public affront possible (Sullivan 404) and calling the traditional form of marriage between a man and a woman a circular fiet (Sullivan 404). sequence referring to marriage as a public contract, Sullivan has just highlighted one aspect of marriage i.e. bond between two people thus excluding all others who are affected by the marriage between the two people that include but are not limited to their parents, and their own children. Marriage is not just about two people, it has its implications on other members of the family, as well as upon the nation as a whole that might be already distress from a neg ative population growth rate, and homosexual marriages are definitely going to aggravate this social problem. Sullivan has made a logical fallacy by limiting the intrinsic status of the heterosexual marriage to its understanding as intrinsically procreative. Sullivan has a preconceived notion that a marriage between an grownup and a minor is unsustainable as one of the two parties does not understand the contract. If an adult and a minor marry each other with mutual consent, Sullivan should roll in the hay that as an emotional bond too just like he approves of the emotional bond between two homosexuals. Sullivan has made broad generalizations that are unfair. For example, he says that everybody who speaks in favor of heterosexual marriage does not do so because he/she disparages the homosexual marriage, but because not doing so means demanding human virtue in excess. I dont believe that this is the reason why people support heterosexual marriages. People support heterosexual marri ages primarily because of their ghostly beliefs, and then because of considering its positive impacts on the society.